You are viewing the translated version of कार्यक्षमताको अभाव.
A judge shall be deemed to lack competence in the following cases:
(a) If the case is not processed and disposed of within the period prescribed by law without reasonable cause,
(b) in the same case If the order or decision that can be made at once is not made at once or if the case is adjourned or the case that is adjourned is adjourned or the case that is adjourned is not taken up, and the case is unnecessarily prolonged by taking irrelevant or illegal action or order,
(c) Proceedings and disposal of the case If the performance is less than normal,
(d) If the case is processed and disposed of using irrelevant law or disregarding the clear and unambiguous interpretation or meaning of the law, and proceeding with another interpretation or meaning,
p>
(e) If different opinions are held and decisions are taken in different cases where there is a legal question of the same kind, but this clause shall not be applicable if the previously expressed opinion in a case is changed to an open opinion based on the grounds and reasons considered to be erroneous.
p>
(f) For making the parties to the case appear or for not doing the work that should be done on the day of the date without reasonable cause,
(g) When ordering to hear the evidence, only hearing the evidence without clarifying the facts or questions that the parties have not agreed upon. If ordered,
(h) this clause shall not apply in cases where the legal principles propounded by the Supreme Court are adverse to the decision, or if consistency or certainty is not maintained in the legal principles propounded by the Supreme Court.
( j) If he does any other work that confirms that he does not have the expected level of performance to perform his official duties.