You are viewing the translated version of प्रशासकीय रेखदेख, नियन्त्रण र निर्देशन.
Rule 8
Administrative supervision, control and direction
(1) District Public Prosecutor's Office and Appellate Public Prosecutor's Office subject to this regulation shall be under the general administrative supervision, control and direction of the Associate Attorney of the Public Prosecutor's Office and all the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Attorney General.
(2) The Office of the Attorney General shall conduct an inspection at least once a year of the Public Prosecutor's Office and the Appellate Public Prosecutor's Offices of the District Public Prosecutor's Offices within their territorial jurisdiction, and the inspecting officer shall submit an inspection report to the Attorney General's Office detailing the following matters:-
(a) Failure to do the work with due diligence in time,
(b) When indicting in a case, after proper evaluation of the evidence found in the investigation, the indictment was made, not made,
(B1) Whether the case was partially prosecuted or not and if it was prosecuted, whether the information was given to the public prosecutor's office and the attorney general's office. (c) Shows necessary vigilance in proceedings related to litigation, argumentation, appeal, or not,
(d) Is there quality and authenticity in the work performed? (e) whether the requested opinion advice was provided in a timely manner,
(f) whether the pleadings and witnesses were present at the trial,
(G) Monthly and annual reports not sent within the time specified in the rules,
(h) Proper control and supervision of subordinate government lawyers and other employees, whether not (i) whether accounting and accounting related work is done in accordance with economic laws and regulations and whether everything is properly maintained,
(j) Whether action has been taken according to the instructions from the Attorney General or Taluk Office or prior inspection,
(k) Missiles, files, law books and magazines are not kept correct and up-to-date.