(1) When any law is inconsistent with this Constitution due to the imposition of unreasonable restrictions on the fundamental rights conferred by this Constitution or for any other reason, such law or any part thereof or any law made by the Provincial Assembly is inconsistent with any law made by the Federal Parliament or any law made by the Municipal Assembly or Village Assembly shall be deemed to be federal. Any Nepalese citizen can apply to the Supreme Court to declare any part of such law to be invalid if it is in conflict with any law made by the Parliament or the Provincial Assembly, and accordingly, if any law is found to be in conflict, the extraordinary right to declare that law invalid and void from the beginning or from the date of decision. It will be to the Supreme Court.
(2) Necessary for the enforcement of the fundamental rights conferred by this Constitution or for the enforcement of any other legal right where no other remedy is provided for or if such remedy is found to be insufficient or ineffective, or for the determination of any constitutional or legal question involved in any dispute of public right or interest. And the Supreme Court will have extraordinary powers to issue appropriate orders, provide appropriate remedies, enforce such rights or settle disputes.
(3) Under the extraordinary jurisdiction under sub-section (2), the Supreme Court may issue other appropriate orders such as habeas corpus, mandamus, extradition, interdiction, writ of mandate. But except for the lack of jurisdiction, the Supreme Court shall not interfere under this clause in the internal proceedings of the Federal Parliament or the Provincial Assembly and the proceedings of the privilege exercised by the Federal Parliament or the Provincial Assembly and the punishment prescribed in connection therewith.
(4) The Supreme Court, subject to this Constitution, shall have the right to initiate and dispose of cases, to hear appeals, to examine merits, to repeat cases, to hear petitions, or to review its judgment or final order, as provided in federal law. In such a review, a judge other than the judge who made the first decision will do it.
(5) Proceedings initiated and dismissed by the High CourtThe Supreme Court shall have the authority to hear appeals of cases and to decide matters of public importance involving questions related to the interpretation of the Constitution and laws or cases recommended by the High Court with its opinion that it is appropriate to have a decision by the Supreme Court.
(6) Other powers and procedures of the Supreme Court shall be in accordance with federal law.